<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://ipv6.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>England</title>
 <link>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/england</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>High-Speed Rail Cost Blowout in England?</title>
 <link>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/content/006038-high-speed-rail-cost-blowout-england</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Sunday Times&lt;/em&gt; (London) &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/hs2-budget-will-balloon-to-80bn-says-secret-report-r9qtwpbpl&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; that it has obtained a secret Cabinet report indicating that “The HS2 high-speed rail project is “highly likely” to go as much as 60% over budget and cost “more than £80 billion.” HS2 refers to the high speed rail project intended to link London to Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds and the East Midlands. According to &lt;em&gt;The Sunday Times&lt;/em&gt; the government’s Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) called the plan “fundamentally flawed” and in a “precarious position.” Further, according to &lt;em&gt;The Sunday Times&lt;/em&gt;, &quot;cost escalation in the £56bn project could threaten wider public spending, interfering with funding across other government departments.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Cabinet report comes just weeks after release of a report by the European Union Court of Auditors. Particularly relevant to the HS2 are the Court&#039;s findings that EU high speed rail projects have been overbuilt. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/006033-eu-auditor-high-speed-rail-criticisms-lessons-north-america-and-australia&quot;&gt;As we reported&lt;/a&gt;, “The European Court of Auditors found that high-speed rail has been built to considerably higher standards than required by their actual operation. They concluded that average speed are so far below the design speed that it &#039;raises questions as to sound financial management.&quot; The Court further found that: “The costs involved could in fact have been far lower, with little or no impact on operations.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, &lt;em&gt;The Sunday Times&lt;/em&gt; indicates that many members of Parliament would favor improvements to the conventional rail service in the corridor, which would obviously cost much less.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/content/006038-high-speed-rail-cost-blowout-england#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/england">England</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/high-speed-rail-0">high-speed rail</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/transportation">transportation</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:52:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6038 at https://ipv6.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California&#039;s Cities Should Look to Oxfordshire </title>
 <link>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/content/001772-californias-cities-should-look-oxfordshire</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;California, now in the midst of a heated debate on high-speed rail, could learn a thing or two from a few small villages in England about consolidating their opposition. Residents from five villages in Oxfordshire created the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/8374718.Villages_unite_to_fight_off_high_speed_rail_link&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Villages of Oxfordshire Opposing HS2 (High-Speed Rail 2) action group&lt;/a&gt; to voice their concerns about the proposed project. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HS2 would link London and Birmingham by 2025, going through Finmere, Mixbury, Fingford, Fulwell, and Newton Purcell in north Oxfordshire. Not only would the rail line greatly alter the countryside landscape, but it would also create an immense amount of noise pollution. Trains would run through these villages at 250 mph about every three minutes. On top of that, rail authorities are giving out little information to citizens who are growing frustrated. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Chairman of Villages of Oxfordshire Opposing HS2, Bernie Douglas, wants the group to influence rail authorities to route the line away from the area and raise awareness about the detriments of a high-speed rail line in the countryside. He has certainly succeeded in the latter goal. The group’s meeting in April drew more than 80 people from an area with only 100 homes. However, their efforts for the former cause have been largely in vain. Transport Minister Phillip Hammond and HS2 Ltd, the company behind the project, have not responded to the group&#039;s letters. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is hope for Oxfordshire, though. A spokesman for the Department of Transport claims that “No final decision will be made on whether to proceed with a high-speed rail line or on its route until any scheme has undergone a full public consultation.” If this is true, it is almost certain that the rail line will not run through Oxfordshire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cities on the Peninsula have similarly started to band together to oppose the California Rail Authority, who has decided against using the much preferred trench system to cut costs, but opposition remains scattered throughout many different groups. Lawsuits from a few cities and organizations have driven the authority to reconsider the trench system, but the project seems like it will continue to progress, much to the dismay of many unhappy California residents. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Atherton, who are at the forefront of the opposition, need to gather support from other cities on the Peninsula to truly affect the future of high-speed rail in the state. It is easy for the California Rail Authority, backed by Governor Schwarzenegger, to defend its position from a few cities, but a united Peninsula coalition would be a tough obstacle to overcome. Maybe Burlingame, San Mateo, and their neighbors should take a page out of the book of Oxfordshire and use collective action to more effectively voice their concerns.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/content/001772-californias-cities-should-look-oxfordshire#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/california">California</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/england">England</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/high-speed-rail">high speed rail</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/rail">rail</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:49:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kirsten Moore</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1772 at https://ipv6.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NGVideo: Reviving Plotlands</title>
 <link>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/content/00870-ngvideo-reviving-plotlands</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Everybody knows we urgently need to build more homes in Britain, but how, when and where will this happen? WORLDbytes interviewed Ian Abley, an architect and manager of Audacity at the plotlands in Dunton, Essex where from the 1920s East End working class couples built cheap homes themselves. Could we do this now?&lt;!--break--&gt; Ian Abley argues we should collectively break the Town &amp;amp; Country Planning law of 1947 which made buying and building on redundant farmland, like the plotlands, illegal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;480&quot; height=&quot;387&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/zXnnxpv_1bs&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0x402061&amp;amp;color2=0x9461ca&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/zXnnxpv_1bs&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0x402061&amp;amp;color2=0x9461ca&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;480&quot; height=&quot;387&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More information and related resources are available &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldbytes.org/programmes/007/007_005_more.html&quot;&gt;here. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This video and its description are derived from original content by WORLDbytes.org with the express permission of their authors. To see the original full-length video, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldbytes.org/programmes/007/007_005.html&quot;&gt;this page.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>https://ipv6.newgeography.com/content/00870-ngvideo-reviving-plotlands#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/england">England</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/europe">Europe</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/housing">housing</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/land-use">Land use</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/planning">planning</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/policy">policy</category>
 <category domain="https://ipv6.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/rural">rural</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:22:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AlexLotz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">870 at https://ipv6.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
